Study Reveals
Possible Future Water Shortages
Lower Methow most at risk
The Methow Watershed Council
paid for an evaluation of river-water use in the Methow
Valley and learned this: if homes were built on all existing
land parcels in the Methow River drainage, nearly 1,100
homes in the lower Methow would need a source of water
other than what is now legally available.
The draft evaluation
also found that if all existing parcels were subdivided
and developed to the limits allowed by current zoning,
127 homes in the upper Methow and more than 24,000 homes
in the lower Methow would be outside the water-use limits.
Right
now, according to the study, no part of the Methow River
Valley is using more domestic and stock water from the river
than is allowed under the law.
The legal limit for water
use was set in 1976 by the ‘Instream Flow Rule for the Methow
River’—Chapter 173-548 of the Washington Administrative
Code. It allows for two cubic feet per second to be taken
from the river for single domestic and stock water uses
in each of seven stream management reaches:
- Headwaters
- Early Winters
- Upper Methow (Mazama to Winthrop
including Goat Creek and Wolf Creek)
- Chewuch
- Middle
Methow (Winthrop to Twisp)
- Twisp River
- Lower Methow
(Twisp to Pateros including Beaver Creek)
The Methow
Watershed Council hired Aspect Consulting to find out
if residents in the Methow Valley Watershed were living
inside water use law, and to make estimates about the
future.
“Under current conditions, all the reaches have
water remaining . . . The minimum remaining (water) reservation
is the Lower Methow reach, which has allocated slightly
more than half of the original reservation,” states the
draft evaluation.
The study estimated water use
associated with a typical residence served by a permit-exempt
well (water right not required).
A land parcel that is subdivided and developed with more
than six residential lots likely would require a water right
from the Washington State Department of Ecology.
In
the unlikely scenario of full allowable subdivision and
buildout there would be 32,000 residences in the Methow
Valley, 80 percent of them in the lower Methow due to the "relatively
small minimum parcel size allowable under existing zoning" in
that reach.
In the more realistic scenario
of buildout on land parcels as they now exist (not further
divided), the existing water reservations are enough for
all but the Lower Methow reach.
The
full draft evaluation is available on the Methow Watershed
Council website: www.methowwatershed.com
The Aspect
Consulting website is: www.aspectconsulting.com
|